Below: A reproduction of Freedom Party's garbage strike campaign brochure - "HAD ENOUGH OF ALL THE GARBAGE?" |
HAD ENOUGH
|
SOME OF IT WAS CLEANED UP. |
WE CAN START... |
It's happened before, and unless City Hall seriously starts to consider the
option of completely contracting out its garbage services to more efficient,
less costly, and dependable private garbage disposal companies, it
will happen again.
Yes, it's another GARBAGE STRIKE. And although the walkout called by the Canadian
Union of Public Employees (CUPE) affects more municipal employees than just
those working directly in waste disposal, we thought that this was one area
where a withdrawal of services would have direct effects on every homeowner
in the City of London. It's an issue that hits you right in your own backyard,
you might say.
Though the union claims it is not trying to put pressure on taxpayers,
you can bet that it's counting on that pressure to turn into political
pressure forcing City Hall to give in to union demands.
"We're prepared to take as long as it may take ... to settle the matter in
a way in which it will benefit the members of this local union," argues CUPE
representative Gilles LeBel in a press interview. "If it takes weeks, if it
takes months, we're prepared to meet the situation." And on the other side of
the controversy, the city administrator has flatly stated that "the city will
never give in."
GARBAGE DISPOSAL: A LOCAL COMPARISON
London is one of an ever-decreasing number of Canadian cities
that do not contract out garbage collection and disposal services.
Residents of Kitchener, for example, pay $14.96 per person per year
for waste collection and disposal, by contracting out the provision
of this service to a private firm called Laidlaw Waste Disposal. Under
this relationship, there is no possibility of a strike or disruption
caused by labour disputes.
London residents, however, pay over $20 per person per year and still
have to risk periodic strikes and disruptions in service!
So for over 25% more in cost, they receive less service and less commitment
to that service!
|
Considering who's ultimately responsible for financing municipal government,
it's surprising that the taxpayer has no active voice in the negotiation of
a basic service that should never be allowed to be threatened by political interests
and objectives.
The union, of course, says it has no answer for what to do with all the garbage
that will pile up during the strike, because its only answer to that problem
is to give the union what it wants --- a labour monopoly restricting the taxpayer's
choice in determining who can provide basic municipal services.
On the other hand, the city government is only taking half-hearted and ineffective
measures --- that in no way address the fundamental issue --- by designating
temporary dump sites, which during the last municipal garbage strike ended up
being in many of London's recreational parks that taxpayers were already paying
to keep up. Because they do not wish to provoke further union unrest, the city
refuses to open London's already-established and tax-supported dump sites. In
so doing, it is denying access to a service and to property that is supposedly
"owned" and financially supported by the very people to whom access is being
denied.
All this, and no refunds, no tax breaks, and not even an apology from either
side in the dispute.
Freedom Party believes that the purpose of government is to protect
our freedom of choice, not to restrict it.
It is in this spirit that we recommend contracting out garbage services
to the most competitive and efficient companies available as the only proper,
practical, and long-term solution to the challenge of providing many of our
basic municipal services. But until that happens, the taxpayer's choice
will remain restricted.
What can one person do? Plenty. What can five, ten, fifty, or a hundred people
do? A lot more. We believe that Londoners can work together even when their
paid elected officials and those paid to provide them with services cannot.
Right now, Freedom Party members, supporters, and volunteers are organizing
to put their time, money, and efforts into a campaign to help alleviate, admittedly
in a small way, the inconvenience caused by a garbage strike. They're willing
to pick up your garbage --- free of charge!
We're not trying to imply that Freedom Party is doing this just as a "community
service," or that we can possibly accomplish a task that we pay millions of
dollars each year to the city to have done for us. We believe that our campaign
is a positive, constructive way of registering citizen protest against
those who would hold them hostage to their economic or political demands. Unlike
the options of picketing, remaining idle, or feeling totally frustrated
in expressing our outrage at this turn of events, we think our campaign will
send a clear message to both city hall and to CUPE representatives.
And at the very least, a small amount of garbage will already have been
disposed of in the process of voicing our protest!
That's why, particularly in the early part of our campaign (and depending on
how long the strike lasts, and on how much support the community offers us),
we can only start by offering LIMITED GARBAGE PICK UP IN RANDOMLY-SELECTED AREAS.
If you've received this pamphlet in your mailbox, then you are either in one
of these selected areas, or very near to one. (see schedule on back)
Volunteer to deliver pamphlets! Volunteer to drive a truck! Lend a truck!*
Volunteer to load garbage. Offer a financial contribution!*
Let yourself be heard! Write or call your alderman, Controller, or Mayor.
Tell them what you think! Write a letter to the editor of the London Free
Press and let the community know what you think!
Let us know what you think and how you might be willing to help. Just phone
our offices.
Turn your frustration & anger into constructive action!
*Contributions to Freedom Party
in cash or kind are tax-creditable!
Contact us for details!
AS TAXPAYERS, WHAT CAN WE DO?
IN THE MEANTIME, HERE'S WHAT WE CAN DO:
Don't get mad! Get even!
HERE'S HOW YOU CAN HELP!
Page
last updated on January 7, 2004